Comments on Öko-Institut consultation for a review of the RoHS 2 Directive scope provisions – 2nd area of review: EEE newly in scope

Published: 10 March 2014

Policies & Issues: Environment

Orgalime thanks the Öko-Institut for the stakeholder consultation to provide further input to the European Commission impact assessment on the scope of the RoHS2 Directive as requested by Article 24(1). However, at an earlier stage a similar study has already been carried out by Bio Intelligence Service on behalf of DG Environment1. We call for taking this earlier study into account in this follow up work. 

As a European association representing the European manufacturers of mechanical, electrical, electronic and metal articles as a whole, Orgalime will focus its comments on the impacts of the suggested scenarios to solve the current side-effects of Articles 2(2), 4(3) and 4(4), as listed under section six of the questionnaire, rather than on sections three, four and five, which, in our view, target individual companies [more in download]

Related Position Papers

Environment: Response to Commission circular economy roadmap consultation [20 January 2020]

Environment: EU-wide uniform conditions for the proper quality treatment of WEEE: A call for Implementing Acts to lay down minimum quality WEEE treatment standards in strict accordance with the European standards [12 December 2019]

Environment: Evaluation of Directive 2011/65/EU (“RoHS”): Improving implementation in a Circular Economy context [6 December 2019]

Environment: Orgalim response to the public consultation on the RoHS evaluation [6 December 2019]

Environment: The European technology industries’ priorities for the sustainable use and management of water in Europe [14 November 2019]

Environment: Orgalim's response to a public consultation on sustainability requirements for batteries [27 August 2019]

Waste policy: Joint industry comments on modulating producers’ financial contributions for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment [26 July 2019]

Eunomia study in support of developing Guidance for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Schemes: Comments on modulation of producers’ financial contributions [12 March 2019]

Feedback on the usability of the taxonomy - Orgalim response [25 February 2019]