Waste Directive - Environment Committee Recommendations 28 Nov 06
In the light of the European institutions’ commitment on Better Regulation and Simplification, Orgalime is highly concerned with a number of recent proposals, which in our view would negatively impact the competitiveness of European engineering industries while establishing overlapping, conflicting and unenforceable requirements that are not necessarily beneficial for the environment and consumers.
Related Position Papers
Environment: Response to Commission circular economy roadmap consultation [20 January 2020]
Environment: EU-wide uniform conditions for the proper quality treatment of WEEE: A call for Implementing Acts to lay down minimum quality WEEE treatment standards in strict accordance with the European standards [12 December 2019]
Environment: Evaluation of Directive 2011/65/EU (“RoHS”): Improving implementation in a Circular Economy context [6 December 2019]
Environment: Orgalim response to the public consultation on the RoHS evaluation [6 December 2019]
Environment: The European technology industries’ priorities for the sustainable use and management of water in Europe [14 November 2019]
Environment: Orgalim's response to a public consultation on sustainability requirements for batteries [27 August 2019]
Waste policy: Joint industry comments on modulating producers’ financial contributions for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment [26 July 2019]
Eunomia study in support of developing Guidance for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Schemes: Comments on modulation of producers’ financial contributions [12 March 2019]
Feedback on the usability of the taxonomy - Orgalim response [25 February 2019]